Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Book Source 2: The Abortion Debate due Wednesday April 11

Title of the Book (in italics when typed, underlined when written)
 Ex: Twilight
The Abortion Debate
Author(s) or Editor
Ex: Stephanie Meyer
Claudia Caruana
Editor: Bruce S. Glassman
Publisher
 Ex: Little, Brown and Company
The Millbrook Press
Year of Publication 
Ex: 2003
1992
City of Publication
Ex: New York
Brookfield
Mode of Access (Print if you read the actual book, Electronic if you found it online, or through your kindle/nook/ereader):
Ex: Print
Print
Eddition if indicated:
N/A


FIVE FACTS FROM THE SOURCE (Embedded):
Many people that are either pro-choice or pro-life demonstrate "peacefully". There are many pro-life people that go to abortion clinics and approach patients because, "As long as they protest peacefully, without physically blocking a patient's way, the couple has a right to be there" (Caruana, 6).
Doctors at clinics such as planned parenthood are used to seeing a wide array of women whom are pregnant under many different circumstances, such as "a woman over forty whose.. genetic test revealed that the twelve-week-old fetus in her womb is developing abnormally" (Caruana, 6).
The Supreme Court has the task of deciding whether or not an action is unconstitutional. They did so in the Roe vs. Wade court case when they decided that, "The right to privacy includes a woman's right to decide whether or not to have children .The right to privacy, and, therefore, the right to abortion, is protected by the Ninth and Fourteenth amendments" (Caruana, 31).
The positive outcome of creating this new law for abortion includes that, although the rate of legal abortions rose steadily until 1980, "Illegal-abortion rates dropped dramatically, from over a million a year to several thousand" (Caruana, 33).
There is often a clash between the national and state government. State legislators often lobby for more power which is denied by the other. The verdict of Roe v. Wade, "allowed states to restrict abortion in order to protect the potential life of the fetus, unless the mother's life or health was endangered" (Caruana, 39). 


Summary of Source (Three-Four Sentences of the Who, What, Where, Why, and How in your own words. NO OPINION):
The Abortion Debate in essence describes the development of abortion in America over a period of time. It includes legislation such as the Roe v. Wade court case, and how it affected society after laws had been put in place. It includes a clash between the national and state legislatures as well as the clash of those that are pro-life and those that are pro-choice, and the demonstrations that they participated in.

Credibility of Source:
Author or Editor: Who is the author? What training have they had? If there is no author, examine the editor.

Claudia Caruana is the author, does not have a biography at the end but she seems on top of her accuracy and the information she brings forth.

Attachment: Does the author or editor have anything to gain from writing this, or is it simply informative? 

This article is simply informative, the author does not have anything to gain.



Bias: Do you detect a bias (a favoring of either side) in the author's writing?
There is no bias in the author's writing, this book simply serves as a timeline for events that took place in the history of abortion in America.

References: Does the author cite references in the writing? If so, do these add or take away from the credibility? 
Yes, the author does cite many references at the end of the book. Her citations add credibility because they originate from professionals in this field with valuable credibility and qualifications regarding abortion.

Use of Source: How will you use this source in your project?

This book is perfect to show the chronological order in which events took place regarding abortions in America. It gives a solid background on legal conflict as well as social conflict, and how the two intermixed.

Book Source 1: Due Wednesday April 11th

Title of the Book (in italics when typed, underlined when written)
 Ex: Twilight
Abortion: Opposing Viewpoints
Author(s) or Editor
Ex: Stephanie Meyer
David Bender, Bruno Leone
Editor: Bonnie Szumski
Publisher
 Ex: Little, Brown and Company
Greenhaven Press
Year of Publication 
Ex: 2003
1986
City of Publication
Ex: New York
San Diego
Mode of Access (Print if you read the actual book, Electronic if you found it online, or through your kindle/nook/ereader):
Ex: Print
Print
Eddition if indicated:
N/A




FIVE FACTS FROM THE SOURCE (Embedded):
It is important for my audience to understand when a human life actually "begins", which is when a sperm cell fertilizes an egg, "known technically as the 'zygote,' containing the full set of forty-six chromosomes required to creat new human life. Conception has occurred" (Bender, 17).
Shettles, with a Ph.D and M.D. from Johns Hopkins University, strongly opposes abortion, and supports his position by saying, "I do so, first, because I accept what is biologically manifest-that human life commences at the time of conception-and, second, because I believe it is wrong to take innocent human life under any circumstances" (Bender, 20).
Emotional bonds create a huge difference in the decision making of an abortion patient; two women had "decided against abortion after seeing ultrasonic pictures of their unborn children... such an experience precipitated the onset of maternal bonding..." (Bender, 31).
Conservative women have a hard time understanding why any woman would want an abortion, because women who "embrace and celebrate their own women's devotion to childbearing have little difficutly appreciating why abortion is a moral issue, they recognize and cherish the deep and fundamental values at stake in these decisions" (Bender, 53-54).
It is difficult for legislation to rule that abortions are illegal, since there are problems that may occur as a result, "who would suggest that we repeal the laws against such crimes because the laws are so often broken?" (Bender, 77).



Summary of Source (Three-Four Sentences of the Who, What, Where, Why, and How in your own words. NO OPINION):
This book takes a conflict and dissects it with numerous arguments coming from different credible sources. It discusses moral issues as well as legal issues and different viewpoints and solutions that may fix the problems. The author himself does not take any sides, only expresses the perspective of other prestigious doctors and well regarded scholars.
Credibility of Source:
Author or Editor: Who is the author? What training have they had? If there is no author, examine the editor.

The author is David Bender, and he does not have any titles or training in anything besides writing. He only writes about others that have had training in the field of abortion.

Attachment: Does the author or editor have anything to gain from writing this, or is it simply informative?

This is simply an informative book.

Bias: Do you detect a bias (a favoring of either side) in the author's writing?
There is no bias, he just states the views and opinions of other scholars and doctors.
References: Does the author cite references in the writing? If so, do these add or take away from the credibility?
Yes, he cites all of his references and they add to the credibility greatly.
 Use of Source: How will you use this source in your project? I can use this to argue for my solution to the moral issues of abortions and also come up with counter-arguments to refute the opposing side.