“Specific Page Title or Article Title” | Abortion: Science |
Primary Contributor to the Website (if given) (author, editor, producer, etc) | Gregg Cunningham (Executive Director) |
Title of the Entire Website (not www.) | |
Publisher or Sponsoring Organization of the website (if given) | |
Date Page was Last Revised | 2006? |
Date You Read It | |
<URL address> ( |
|
This article begins by defining when a life “begins”, using Professor Micheline Matthews-Roth’s statement that “’It is scientifically correct to say that an individual human life begins at conception’” (Matthews-Roth, |
They further prove their point by citing Doctor Jerome LeJuene, professor of genetics at the |
The site explains that fertilization is, “the exact moment when a new human being comes into existence.” It supports this by explaining that this new life has still “inherited 23 chromosomes from each parent” which “contains the entire genetic code for every detail of individual human development” ( |
Even the Senate agreed on when a life begins based off of scientific research, saying that “’scientists agree that conception marks the beginning of the life of a human being – a being that is alive and is a member of the human species’” (Senate Report, |
It has been written in a book by doctors E.L. Potter and J.M. Craig that “’Every time a sperm cell and ovum unite a new being is created which is alive and will continue to live unless its death is brought about by some specific condition’” (Pathology of the Fetus and the Infant, |
Summary of Source (Three-Four Sentences of the Who, What, Where, Why, and How in your own words. NO OPINION):
Credibility of Source:
Author or Site: Who is the author? What training have they had? If there is no author, examine the site. What is the purpose of the site? Who funds the site?
I expect that numerous people have helped create all of the web pages. I’m sure they are mostly written or at least revised by Gregg Cunningham since he is the executive director. It does not state who the actual author is though. The site attempts to convince people to fight abortion and take a stand against it. The site is funded by donations; it does not show indication of any other funding.
Attachment: Does the author or site have anything to gain from writing this, or is it simply informative? For example, is it a cigarette business posting an article about the benefit of cigarettes, or is it a scientific community unaffiliated with the cigarette business?
Yes, the website simply wants to save lives. It is informative as well but their dilemma concerns the morality of abortion.
Attachment: Does the author or site have anything to gain from writing this, or is it simply informative? For example, is it a cigarette business posting an article about the benefit of cigarettes, or is it a scientific community unaffiliated with the cigarette business?
Yes, the website simply wants to save lives. It is informative as well but their dilemma concerns the morality of abortion.
Bias: Do you detect a bias (a favoring of either side) in the author's writing?
Oh yes, there is bias without discretion. The website clearly takes a pro-life stance. The whole purpose of the website is to stop abortion and help those who are considering an abortion or have stress after having one.
Oh yes, there is bias without discretion. The website clearly takes a pro-life stance. The whole purpose of the website is to stop abortion and help those who are considering an abortion or have stress after having one.
References: Does the author cite references in the writing? If so, do these add or take away from the credibility?
Yes, many. It adds to the credibility, the website uses quotes from a professor for
Use of Source: How will you use this source in your project?
I will use this source mostly for interviews and personal experiences. It will mostly be used for the emotional appeal of my project, it has graphic pictures and has good arguments that I can use to take a stance against abortions. Although it utilizes logos as well, it mostly appeals to pathos.
I will use this source mostly for interviews and personal experiences. It will mostly be used for the emotional appeal of my project, it has graphic pictures and has good arguments that I can use to take a stance against abortions. Although it utilizes logos as well, it mostly appeals to pathos.